Most people--"fans" especially--are bemoaning its existence. "He's too old", "The fourth one was awful, kill the franchise with fire", or "The third one should have been the last one" are so ubiquitous that I'm not even going to link to them. Just google it or search Twitter/Facebook/Instagram and you'll be inundated with Indy 5 hate.
This is the point that irks me the most: the theory that there shouldn't be another Indiana Jones movie. That the original "trilogy", which was never officially announced or planned as a trilogy, should be all there is to say about Indiana Jones and his adventures.
Oh this? This is just an officially sanctioned and produced entire television series from the original creative team. But no, they just wanted to tell three stories, sure. Sure.
Here's the thing though. The very idea of the character and his adventures is that they should continue indefinitely. Do me a favor and read what I consider pretty much the holy grail (see what I did there?) of Indiana Jones information. The original story conference between Lucas, Spielberg, and Kasdan from 1978.
Go ahead. I'll wait.
SEE? SEE?!! Does that sound like the plans of three guys who just wanted to tell three stories? Keep in mind, all of the ideas they come with in this story conference were for ONE MOVIE THAT GOT SPLIT AMONG THE THREE MOVIES WE GOT! That's right--they were interested in creating a character that essentially had an endless series of adventures, and that's the entire (and only!) point:
LUCAS:
Generally, the concept is a serial idea. Done like the Republic serials. As a thirties serial.
Which is where a lot of stuff comes from anyway. One of the main ideas was to have, depending on
whether it would be every ten minutes or every twenty minutes, a sort of a cliffhanger situation
that we get our hero into. If it's every ten minutes we do it twelve times.
Obviously he's technically talking about the one movie. But the entire concept, again, was to have a character in exciting situations AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE.
And see how he mentions the Republic serials? What are those, you might ask? Check it out:
Republic Pictures
That is a list of the serials Republic made, all of which had chapters totaling at least 12. They were a half hour each. So even if you want to be pedantic about it and say they would have to match the output of their inspiration, Lucas and Spielberg went into this with the theory in the back of their minds that they could make AT LEAST six movies (12 chapters at a half hour each) to cover ONE entire Indiana Jones 'serial'.
Add to that the comparisons made to James Bond. Spielberg and Lucas have said that this is the American James Bond. And to date, there are 24 Bond movies, with no end in sight.
My point is--complaining that there is another Indiana Jones movie is simply disingenuous to the spirit and inspiration of the character, including the intentions of the filmmakers all those "fans" swear to lionize. Spielberg and Ford want to continue doing them. So they're doing them.
And you know what? Even though Ford will be 77 when the film comes out, I'm sure it will be pretty good. All of the films are either good (the first three) or at least have some great moments (Crystal Skull). Without the influence of latter-day Lucas, and with Spielberg and Ford still capable of making some pretty great movies (Lincoln, The Force Awakens, etc., etc. ), there's no reason to think this won't be at least two hours of fun.
Ford is going strong at 75-ish. He was phenomenal in The Force Awakens. Even if he's creaky and slow, he's still Harrison Ford playing Indiana Jones and he will entertain the hell out of us.
I admit to being heavily biased, but right now, there's no reason to not look forward to the continuation of Indiana Jones' adventures.
Until the inevitable talk of a reboot gets underway. Then we'll talk.